“Happiness is not a matter of intensity but of balance and order and rhythm and harmony.” ~ Thomas Merton
“If you want to be happy, be.” ~ Tolstoy
Happiness and intensity are not the same thing.
I really enjoy browsing Gretchen Rubin’s blog The Happiness Project, especially if I’m feeling emotionally stuck or apathetic. If you aren’t familiar with it, start with the “Best Of” page or explore links in the left or right column. Her lively writing, blog design, and practical suggestions are like the first breeze of summer.
At the same time, I’m one of those people who, the more I try to be happy, the less I succeed. I’m not “anti-happiness” by any means, and I certainly don’t consider myself to be, to borrow a phrase from Amy Bloom’s essay “The Rap on Happiness,” a fashionable scowler. But I do find that it doesn’t work for me to make happiness a life’s project. If I spent every day thinking about being happy, I’d be, well, not.
Bloom describes how the transient nature of happiness is part of its elusiveness:
“To hold happiness is to hold the understanding that the world passes away from us, that the petals fall and the beloved dies. No amount of mockery, no amount of fashionable scowling will keep any of us from knowing and savoring the pleasure of the sun on our faces or save us from the adult understanding that it cannot last forever.”
It is the combination of the “pleasure of the sun on our faces” with understanding and self-reflection that can lead to intensity of experience.
Intensity: Exceptionally great concentration, power, or force.
Like happiness, intensity is hard to describe, but we know it when we see or feel it. Unlike happiness, it is not something most people strive to feel all the time.
For some people, however, intensity is an everyday experience.
The editors of Living with Intensity explain how the work of Polish psychiatrist and psychologist Kazimierz Dabrowski has helped us to understand the role of intensity in everyday life, especially as it pertains to gifted young people:
“Dabrowski had a strong interest in the emotional development of intellectually and artistically gifted youth. He was struck by their intensity, sensitivity, and tendency toward emotional extremes. He didn’t see these traits as abnormal but as part and parcel of their talented, creative selves. In their intensified experiencing, feeling, thinking, and imagining, he perceived potential for further growth (Dabrowski, 1967, 1972). He saw inner forces at work that on the one hand generated overstimulation, conflict, and pain, but on the other hand, these factors provoked individuals to search for a way through the pain, strife, and disharmony. Dabrowski’s life work embraced the heightened excitability of individuals, their drive, curiosity, and their urge to challenge conformity, complacency, and smug self-satisfaction.”
[References: Dabrowski, K. (1967). Personality-Shaping through Positive Disintegration. Boston: Little, Brown; and Dabrowski, K. (1972). Psychoneurosis Is Not an Illness. London: Gryf]
Note there is no mention of happiness. Drive, yes. Curiosity. Challenge. Intensified experience. But not happiness.
Does this mean that intense people cannot be happy? Or is it rather that the kind of happiness we strive so hard for may not always be in everyone’s best interest in the long run?
Could it be that by relentlessly pursing a happy life, we shut the door on a different kind of experience or intensity that could, as Dabrowski theorized, lead to personal growth and a different kind of happiness?
Thomas Merton’s description of “balance and order and rhythm and harmony” is close to my own understanding and experience of happiness. However, is that the entire puzzle?
T. S. Eliot in the Four Quartets wrote of the difference between “moments of happiness” that are, on the one hand, a mere “sense of well-being,/Fruition, fulfilment, security or affection,/Or even a very good dinner” and, on the other, “the sudden illumination—”:
We had the experience but missed the meaning,
And approach to the meaning restores the experience
In a different form, beyond any meaning
We can assign to happiness.
~ T. S. Eliot, The Four Quartets, “The Dry Salvages”
How do you understand happiness and intensity?
How are they different?
How are they related?

An engineering approach to happiness: http://garrysub.posterous.com/happiness-flowchart-repeat-this-cycle-frequen
Love it! I’m going to pass this along to some MSOE students I know. Thanks.
Great post, Lisa. I know because I’ve had so many intense moments of despair that intensity and happiness are very different. Elation is one thing, but I think deep happiness is not all that intense really. For me it has a serene quality, a sense of well-being. I love the TS Eliot quote. It really captures the feelings for me. Thanks for sharing!
I’m glad that the topic resonates for someone else! A combination of the intense moment and the serenity you mention is what I think I want. I used to read “The Four Quartets” at least once a year, and I definitely want to return to that habit.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ami Mattison. Ami Mattison said: On Happiness and Intensity @ http://everydayintensity.com/2010/04/27/on-happiness-and-intensity/ [...]